Apple pushes back on call to end diversity programme
4 min readApple’s board of directors has urged investors to vote against a proposal that would abolish the company’s Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programmes. The proposal, put forward by the conservative group National Center for Public Policy Research (NCPPR), claims that DEI initiatives expose companies to potential litigation, reputational damage, and financial risks. Despite these concerns, Apple’s directors argue that the company already has a robust compliance program in place and that the proposal is unnecessary.
The NCPPR’s call for the end of DEI policies reflects a broader trend among some conservative groups who are increasingly critical of such initiatives, particularly in the wake of the Supreme Court’s 2023 ruling on affirmative action in university admissions. These groups argue that DEI programmes violate principles of fairness and equal treatment.
In its response, Apple’s board emphasized that the company’s existing policies already ensure compliance with legal requirements and that the NCPPR’s proposal seeks to micromanage Apple’s internal processes. The board further explained that suggesting specific legal compliance methods, as the proposal does, would undermine the company’s ability to manage its policies according to its own needs and standards.
The proposal is set to be put to a vote by Apple’s shareholders at the company’s annual general meeting on February 25. While the vote will allow shareholders to weigh in, Apple has strongly opposed the motion, highlighting that its DEI initiatives are in line with current laws and regulations. Despite mounting pressure from conservative factions, Apple remains firm in its commitment to its DEI policies, which have been integral to its company culture for years.
The debate surrounding Apple’s DEI policies comes at a time when several other major US corporations are rolling back or reassessing their own diversity programmes. Companies like Meta, Amazon, Walmart, and McDonald’s have been re-evaluating their DEI initiatives in response to a changing political and legal landscape, particularly following the Supreme Court’s decision on affirmative action. Meta, for instance, has recently scaled back its DEI efforts, citing the shifting legal environment as one of the reasons for the change.
Meta’s decision to reduce its focus on DEI was further influenced by the upcoming return of Donald Trump to the White House in 2025, a move that has prompted many corporations to reassess their strategies. Trump has been vocal in his criticism of DEI programmes, calling them divisive and harmful to free enterprise. In response to these political pressures, Meta’s CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, has been working to rebuild relationships with conservative figures, including contributing $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund and hiring a Republican as the company’s new public affairs chief. Additionally, Zuckerberg has announced that Meta will be removing its fact-checking programs, which had previously been implemented to reduce misinformation on its platforms.
The growing trend of rolling back DEI initiatives in major corporations has raised concerns about the future of diversity and inclusion in the workplace. Advocates for DEI programmes argue that such initiatives are crucial for promoting fairness and equality in a corporate environment, and they warn that rolling them back could have negative consequences for both employees and company culture.
The shift in corporate policies is part of a broader reaction to increasing pressure from conservative groups, who argue that DEI programmes can lead to discrimination against certain groups and violate principles of merit-based hiring. Legal challenges have been mounted against such programmes, with critics pointing to the 2023 Supreme Court ruling that deemed race-based affirmative action in college admissions to be unconstitutional.
Apple, however, has remained steadfast in its support for diversity and inclusion. In its filing to investors, the company stated that its compliance program is designed to mitigate any legal risks associated with DEI efforts and that its policies have been continuously updated to align with changes in the legal landscape. Apple’s board emphasized that diversity remains a core value of the company, and they are committed to ensuring a fair and inclusive environment for all employees.
As the debate continues, Apple’s decision to keep its DEI policies intact stands in contrast to the broader trend of corporate rollbacks. While some companies are responding to political pressures by scaling back their diversity efforts, Apple is choosing to maintain its focus on inclusion, arguing that these programmes are vital to its long-term success and societal responsibility.
With the issue likely to remain a point of contention in the coming years, the upcoming vote on the NCPPR’s proposal will be closely watched, as it could set a precedent for how other major companies handle similar pressure in the future. For now, Apple is committed to defending its DEI programmes and ensuring that diversity remains a core aspect of its corporate culture.