Mum who took baby in pram to riot sentenced

A mother has been sentenced after taking her baby to a riot, with a judge describing her actions as “misguided, naive, and immature.” Nevey Smith, 21, from Oldham, pushed her 20-month-old son in a pram while participating in a violent protest outside the Holiday Inn in Newton Heath, Manchester, on July 31.

Smith was part of a crowd that had gathered to demonstrate following a series of nationwide disturbances triggered by a tragic incident where three girls were stabbed at a holiday club in Southport on July 29. During the chaos, Smith was accused of throwing water at police officers attempting to restore order. She pleaded guilty to the charge of violent disorder and received a community order from Manchester Crown Court.

Judge Patrick Field KC expressed his concerns over Smith’s judgment during the sentencing, emphasizing the responsibility she had as a parent. He remarked, “You chose to join the disorder despite having your 20-month-old child in a pushchair. What on earth were you thinking? I doubt you had his safety in mind.” Although he acknowledged that Smith’s role in the riot was “minimal and peripheral”—noting she did not participate in throwing bricks or encouraging violence—he stressed the serious implications of her decision to bring her child into such a dangerous situation.

The protest was part of a broader wave of unrest that followed the knife attack in Southport, which deeply affected communities across the country. The incident led to significant public outcry and tensions, resulting in various demonstrations that sometimes turned violent.

Daniel Calder, Smith’s defense attorney, argued that she had not intended to participate in the protest that day. He explained that she was simply passing by when she “foolishly” became involved in the chaos. Calder further clarified that Smith had not expressed any discriminatory views and was unaware of what an asylum seeker was.

Ultimately, Smith was sentenced to a community order that includes attending reviews at a women’s problem-solving court and completing 100 hours of unpaid work. This approach aims to help her reflect on her actions and the consequences they carry, particularly as a parent.

In a related case, Smith’s mother, Vanessa Smith, 42, was also present during the protest and has admitted to charges of violent disorder. She is set to be sentenced on Thursday, and Judge Field has warned her that all sentencing options, including a custodial sentence, remain on the table.

The case highlights the complexities surrounding individual actions during moments of social unrest, especially when children are involved. It serves as a reminder of the responsibilities that come with parenting, particularly in volatile situations where safety can be easily compromised.

As the sentencing unfolds, it raises questions about the broader societal issues that lead to such protests and the impact of violence on communities. The events in Manchester reflect a growing concern about public safety and the role of individuals in maintaining peace during times of crisis.

Overall, the consequences of Nevey Smith’s decision to involve her child in a riot will have lasting implications, not only for her personally but also for how society views parental responsibility in chaotic circumstances. The case serves as a crucial example for other parents about the potential risks associated with participating in violent protests, particularly when the safety of children is at stake.