Canada’s oil patch rattled by Trump’s tariff threat
4 min read
Getty Images
In Canada’s oil-rich province of Alberta, there is growing anxiety over U.S. President-elect Donald Trump’s threat to impose a 25% tariff on Canadian goods, a move that could severely impact the country’s economy. This potential tariff has raised concerns across the Canadian political and energy sectors, with experts warning of its far-reaching consequences for both Canada and its largest trading partner, the United States.
Trump’s announcement in late 2016 that, upon taking office, he would implement a broad tariff on goods from both Mexico and Canada—without specifying exemptions for oil and gas—has raised alarms in the energy community. Dennis McConaghy, a former energy executive based in Alberta, emphasized that Canada has little choice but to find a way to negotiate with the incoming U.S. administration. McConaghy stressed that failure to address this issue could have dire consequences for Alberta’s economy, which relies heavily on the oil industry.
Lisa Baiton, president and CEO of the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP), expressed concerns that such a tariff would likely force Canada to reduce its oil production. This could lead to significant job losses in Alberta, where the oil sector plays a pivotal role in the local economy. Baiton also highlighted the broader implications for the entire country, noting that provinces that are economically weaker rely on financial transfers from wealthier provinces like Alberta to help fund social services and offset costs. A reduction in oil production could diminish these transfers and create a ripple effect across Canada’s economy.
Additionally, McConaghy warned that the tariff could contribute to a further devaluation of the Canadian dollar, already under pressure due to internal economic challenges. He pointed out that about 80% of Canada’s trade is with the U.S., and a significant portion of that trade is in hydrocarbons. The deep integration of Canada’s economy with the U.S. means that any disruption in trade—especially concerning oil—would have a profound impact.
The potential tariff on Canadian oil is also causing concern in the U.S. fuel industry, as American refineries heavily depend on Canadian crude. The American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM) industry group issued a statement urging Trump to exclude oil and gas from any proposed tariffs. The group likened crude oil to flour in a bakery, stating, “Crude oil is to refineries what flour is to bakeries,” underscoring its critical role in the fuel production process. A tariff on Canadian oil would increase the cost of raw materials for U.S. refineries, driving up the cost of fuel production across the country.
Regions in the U.S., such as California, the Northeast, and parts of the Midwest, lack sufficient domestic oil infrastructure and rely on imports to meet their energy needs. Approximately 40% of the crude oil refined in the U.S. is imported, with the majority of it coming from Canada. In particular, the Midwest’s refineries are set up to process heavier Canadian oil blends. A tariff on Canadian crude could make it more expensive for U.S. refineries to operate, raising fuel costs for consumers. Analysts estimate that gasoline prices in states like Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Michigan could increase by as much as 75 cents per gallon.
Such an increase in fuel prices would run counter to Trump’s campaign promise to lower energy costs for Americans. Throughout his campaign, Trump vowed to reduce gas prices to under $2 per gallon, a goal that appears increasingly unlikely if tariffs are imposed on Canadian oil. However, Trump has also promised to reduce U.S. dependence on foreign oil, focusing instead on increasing domestic drilling and securing energy independence.
Despite these concerns, it remains unclear whether Trump’s tariff threat will materialize. Analysts suggest that Trump may be using the threat of tariffs as a bargaining tool to secure concessions from Canada and Mexico, particularly related to border security. Trump has indicated that the tariffs will remain in place until both countries take action to address the flow of illegal migrants and drugs across their shared borders.
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has pledged to work with the incoming Trump administration to avoid the blanket tariffs and protect Canada’s trade interests. Trudeau has convened meetings with provincial and territorial leaders, including those from Alberta, to discuss a strategy for handling the tariff threat. Alberta’s Premier, Danielle Smith, emphasized that her province would work aggressively to communicate the importance of Canadian oil to U.S. energy security. She also acknowledged that Trump’s concerns about border security were valid and expressed support for efforts to address them.
In the coming months, Alberta and other provinces are expected to push for a resolution to ensure that tariffs on Canadian oil do not materialize, recognizing the serious economic risks at stake. As McConaghy noted, Canadian officials must act with urgency to remove the tariff threat from the table and protect their economy from a potentially catastrophic trade war with the U.S.
About The Author
