Katy Perry v Katie Perry: Singer wins right to use name in Australia
3 min read
Katy Perry has won a legal battle to retain the rights to her name in Australia, after an Australian designer, Katie Taylor, attempted to challenge her use of the name as a trademark. The singer had been selling merchandise during her 2014 Australian tour under the name “Katy Perry,” which led to a trademark dispute with Taylor, who sells clothing under her birth name, Katie Perry.
On Friday, three appeals judges overturned a previous court ruling that had sided with Taylor. The court’s original decision, made last year, favored Taylor’s claim to the trademark, arguing that she had the right to use her birth name for her business. However, the appeals judges ruled that Perry had been using her name as a trademark long before Taylor started her clothing line, and by that time, Perry had already gained significant international recognition as an entertainer.
The judges pointed out that Perry had developed her name into a global brand years before Taylor filed for the trademark, and that Perry’s fame in the entertainment world was well-established by the time Taylor launched her business. As a result, the court canceled Taylor’s trademark registration.
Taylor expressed her disappointment with the decision, describing the legal struggle as a “David and Goliath” battle. In a statement to the Sydney Morning Herald, she said she was “devastated” by the outcome of the case, as it effectively meant losing the trademark she had been using for her fashion business.
The appeals court noted that the case was unfortunate because it involved two women who had unknowingly developed businesses under the same name. Both women had worked hard to establish their respective brands but were unaware of the other’s existence until Taylor sought to register the trademark. The judges acknowledged that both Perry and Taylor had invested considerable effort into their businesses, and the case highlighted the challenges faced by entrepreneurs trying to secure their names in a global marketplace.
The judges also expressed sympathy for the situation, recognizing the “blood, sweat, and tears” both women had poured into their ventures. However, they ultimately ruled that Perry’s international fame and her use of the name long before Taylor’s trademark application outweighed Taylor’s claim to the name.
This ruling is a significant victory for Perry, who has been using her name as part of her global brand for years. The legal case also brings attention to the complexities of trademark law, especially when it involves public figures whose names become synonymous with their careers.
In a memorable moment, the judge who initially ruled in favor of Taylor last year referenced one of Perry’s most famous songs in her ruling. She described the situation as “a tale of two women, two teenage dreams and one name,” a nod to Perry’s hit song “Teenage Dream.”
As Perry celebrates this legal victory, she is also preparing for her upcoming Lifetimes world tour, which is set to begin in early 2025 in support of her new album, 143. The tour will mark her return to the stage after a brief hiatus and comes at a time when her name continues to be recognized worldwide.
The decision in this case serves as a reminder of the importance of protecting one’s brand and intellectual property, particularly for individuals who have built global fame. Perry’s victory reinforces her position as the rightful owner of the trademark for her name, a name that has become synonymous with her successful career in music and entertainment.
While Taylor’s trademark claim has been rejected, the case has highlighted the challenges that small business owners face when their brands clash with the trademarks of more famous individuals. For now, Perry can continue using her name in merchandise and promotions, while Taylor will have to explore other avenues for her clothing brand.
About The Author
