Senate passes defense policy bill that bans gender-affirming care for transgender children of service members
3 min read
Sen. Tammy Baldwin, D-Wis., led a group of more than 20 Democratic senators to amend the bill to remove language banning gender-affirming care for military family children.
On Wednesday, the Senate voted to pass the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), a critical defense policy bill that has sparked intense debate due to its inclusion of a ban on gender-affirming care for transgender children of service members. This provision, driven by Republicans, has angered many Democrats, overshadowing other provisions in the bill.
The legislation will now be sent to President Joe Biden after passing the Republican-controlled House last week. However, the White House has not yet indicated whether Biden will sign the bill into law. The bill’s passage comes after a contentious battle, with both sides weighing in on the implications of the gender-affirming care ban.
The NDAA is a major piece of legislation that sets the policy agenda and authorizes funding for the Department of Defense each year. Traditionally, it passes with broad bipartisan support. However, this year’s bill has become a focal point of division due to the inclusion of the controversial ban on gender-affirming care for the children of service members. The legislation prohibits the military’s health program, TRICARE, from covering such treatments for transgender minors.
While the gender-affirming care ban has been a point of contention, the NDAA also contains provisions that have garnered bipartisan support. Among the most notable is a 14.5% pay raise for junior enlisted service members, a measure designed to help address concerns about military personnel compensation and retention. Despite this, the gender-affirming care ban has dominated the conversation, especially among Democrats who have voiced their discontent with the provision.
Some Democrats have vowed to withhold their vote for the NDAA this year because of the gender-affirming care ban. Others, while opposed to the provision, have stated they would still support the broader bill due to the other benefits it provides, such as the pay raises for service members. A group of Democratic senators, led by Sen. Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin, proposed an amendment to remove the ban on gender-affirming care. However, their efforts were unsuccessful, and the ban remains in place.
The issue of gender-affirming care for transgender individuals, particularly minors, has become increasingly polarizing in the United States. Gender-affirming care involves a range of medically necessary, evidence-based practices that help individuals transition from the gender assigned to them at birth to the gender they identify with. The treatment options are designed to be medically safe and are based on scientific guidelines.
This provision banning gender-affirming care for transgender children of service members aligns with broader Republican efforts to restrict such treatments. Some Republican candidates have made this issue a focal point in the election cycle, while others argue that it is necessary to protect children from decisions they may regret later in life. The measure reflects growing political battles over cultural issues, including gender identity, with Republicans seeking to solidify their stance against what they perceive as progressive policies on gender and sexuality.
The topic has also raised concerns among some Democrats, who acknowledge that they need to reassess their approach to cultural issues. Following disappointing election results in November, some within the Democratic Party have admitted that they need to find a better balance on contentious topics like gender-affirming care, which has become a focal point of debates around the rights of transgender individuals.
The passage of the NDAA with the gender-affirming care ban marks a significant moment in the ongoing culture war, as it combines military policy with deeply divisive social issues. Supporters of the bill argue that it reflects the values of those who want to protect children from making irreversible decisions. Opponents, particularly those in the LGBTQ+ community and their allies, view it as a harmful step backward in the fight for equal rights and access to healthcare.
As the bill moves closer to the president’s desk, the outcome remains uncertain. President Biden’s decision on whether to sign the NDAA into law will likely have significant implications for both national defense policy and the broader political landscape, particularly as the country continues to grapple with the intersection of social issues and government policy.
In conclusion, the passage of the NDAA with the gender-affirming care ban represents a key moment in the debate over transgender rights in the U.S., with deep political divides between Republicans and Democrats. The outcome will likely influence future discussions around healthcare access for transgender individuals, particularly minors, in the context of military families.
About The Author
